麻烦您帮忙翻译下东西好吗?

Education is a subject-matter on which many people have , and reasonably have , a view . There always has been a public involvement in education and this has grown as part of the more general ‘rights movements ’of which consumerism is one form. The population as a whole is better informed and has more awareness of rights than formerly . As a consequence, the tendency is to require the professions to supply a service on demand, and according to the perceptions of the consumer rather than those of the professional. If this movement develops will it destroy the authority of the professions? Does it mean that teachers cannot speak with authority on education?
In reply it might be said that this challenge to teachers does not undermine their authority unless they allow it to do so .What the challenge should do is to revitalize the profession because it threatens the complacency and conservatism which afflict any profession, and it compels teachers to communicate more effectively. True authority emerges when paternalistic authoritarianism is challenged . (P. 158)
The state is a powerful client for the professional services of teachers , and in recent years has increased central – and also local – modes of accountability which are congruent with national policy .There nevertheless remain inherent conflicts between the needs and expectations of different sets of clients which it is beyond the scope of accountability procedures to reconcile. The teaching profession will continue to play a key role in mediating these demands , and this requires the exercise of responsibility.

教育是许多人民有和合理地有，看法的主题。 总是有在教育的公开介入，并且这增长作为消费者至上主义是一组成的更加一般的‘rights运动’of一部分。 整体上人口比以前是更好消息灵通的并且有权利的更多了悟。 结果，倾向是要求行业根据消费者的悟性提供服务在要求时，和而不是那些专家。 如果这运动开发它将毁坏行业的当局？ 是否意味着老师不可能与在教育的当局讲话？
In回复也许说对老师的这个挑战不破坏他们的当局，除非他们允许它如此做。什么挑战应该做是使行业复苏，因为它威胁折磨所有行业的自满和保守主义，并且它强迫老师更加有效地沟通。 当家长式命令主义被质询时，真实的当局涌现。 (P. 158)
The状态是老师专业服务的一个强有力的客户和近年来增加了中央–并且是一致的与国家政策责任的地方–方式。然而那里保持在的不同的套的需要和期望的之间固有冲突它是超出和解的责任做法的范围之外客户。 教学工作在斡旋这些要求将继续扮演一个关键角色，并且这要求责任锻炼。

很多人有和一视野合乎情理有的Education存在一主题右手击球员的左后方场地.总是已经有一公共的在教育的卷入和这个已经长出保护消费者利益运动存在一形成的更普遍‘rights动作’of作为的一部分.人口作为整体过去被更好些通知和有更的多的认识权利与相比.因此,趋势是要要求专业按照要求和根据对消费者的觉察力而不是专业人员的那些弥补一服务.如果这动作生长,它将毁灭专业的权威吗?它意味着老师不能和教育方面的权威谈话吗? 在朝派回答它可以被说这对teachers的挑战不损坏他们的权威除非他们允许它.What那样做,因为它威胁折磨任何专业的自满和保守主义,和它迫使teachers更有效交流,挑战将去存在使专业充满活力.当家长式统治的authoritarianism存在提出挑战的时候,真实权威出现.P.158为职业services的teachers和在最近几年中国家存在a强大客户已经增加?C中心地区和也负有责任的尽管如此是随着国家政策.There一致的本地?C方式依然是内在的需要和期望不同的套超出和解负有责任过程的范围clients哪一个它存在之间的冲突.教师界将继续在调停这些需求中起重要作用,和这个要求练习的责任.

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息