求托福范文，Government should not offer artists likemusicians, filmmakers any financial support.
答案:2 悬赏:10 手机版
解决时间 2021-02-04 03:06
- 提问者网友：火车头
- 2021-02-03 21:57
求托福范文，Government should not offer artists likemusicians, filmmakers any financial support.
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：洒脱疯子
- 2021-02-03 22:53
Some people believe that the government should provide financial
assistance to all artists including painters, musicians and poets.
Others think that it is a waste of money.
Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
People
have a varied opinion whether the government should assist a financial
support to the artists or not. However, while it is true that the
government should help artists, I would argue that spending money on
artists is not a waste of money
It is often said that art forms
are an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. They maintain
that by providing financial assisting to artists, the government can
help protect the cultural heritage of the country. Moreover, they point
out the advent of films and television has considerably affected the
popularity of other art forms, and without such support from the
governments could mean that many ethnic art forms will die out.
However,
despite this argument, I would argue that spending money on arts and
artists is wasteful as there are several other sectors that desperately
need government funding. For example, in many undeveloped and developing
countries millions of people do not have an access to safe drinking
water, and even proper education for many children s beyond reach.
Meeting these requirements is far more important than protecting the
nation's art forms from extinction.
In conclusion i tend to feel
that the government support in arts is unjustified, and therefore, could
be better spend on other development factors which are much needed
assistance to all artists including painters, musicians and poets.
Others think that it is a waste of money.
Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
People
have a varied opinion whether the government should assist a financial
support to the artists or not. However, while it is true that the
government should help artists, I would argue that spending money on
artists is not a waste of money
It is often said that art forms
are an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. They maintain
that by providing financial assisting to artists, the government can
help protect the cultural heritage of the country. Moreover, they point
out the advent of films and television has considerably affected the
popularity of other art forms, and without such support from the
governments could mean that many ethnic art forms will die out.
However,
despite this argument, I would argue that spending money on arts and
artists is wasteful as there are several other sectors that desperately
need government funding. For example, in many undeveloped and developing
countries millions of people do not have an access to safe drinking
water, and even proper education for many children s beyond reach.
Meeting these requirements is far more important than protecting the
nation's art forms from extinction.
In conclusion i tend to feel
that the government support in arts is unjustified, and therefore, could
be better spend on other development factors which are much needed
全部回答
- 1楼网友：几近狂妄
- 2021-02-03 23:59
我是来看评论的
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯