永发信息网

英语电影的英语观后感五篇初一水平,字不用太多100以下

答案:2  悬赏:20  手机版
解决时间 2021-04-08 05:42
  • 提问者网友:箛茗
  • 2021-04-07 06:23
帮帮忙~~60字左右好了,不用太多呀
最佳答案
  • 五星知识达人网友:鸽屿
  • 2021-04-07 07:53
阿甘正传观后感(中英文对照)
阿甘有自己的坚持,他不断地跑步e799bee5baa6e4b893e5b19e31333330343938,JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:"人要往前看,千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别,不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流,很少人会坚持做一件事,阿甘坚持自己的坚持,于是他成了“神”。影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他,让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活,生活得很颓废,责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态,去和阿甘一起捕鱼生活,有了收获后,开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹,绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态,一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息:或许做好我们该做的每一件事,生活就会给我们一个好的回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。
Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.
He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the
meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many
people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing,
Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his
legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him
and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life,
complaining that A Gan shouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing
with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is
intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always
after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to
ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do
well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if
only there is perseverance.
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.

《冒牌天神2》观后感:
This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.
全部回答
  • 1楼网友:人间朝暮
  • 2021-04-07 08:11
英语电影英文观后感《功夫熊猫》(《kung fu panda》)的: <1> funny! i see this movie lastweek, so terrfic,this film make me loving kung fu! my liitle sister love the panda very much ,she ask me which kind annimal of panda? i told her its one of the cutiest animal in the world ,it only lives in china. in this movie, panda learns how to improve his level of kung fu,many scence show that this cartoon is so funny, you can see how things goes on with laugh, i recommend this film to you.! <2> the film stars a panda named po (voice of jack black), who is so fat he can barely get out of bed. he works for his father, mr. ping (james hong) in a noodle shop, which features ping's legendary secret ingredient. how ping, apparently a stork or other billed member of the avian family, fathered a panda is a mystery, not least to po, but then the movie is filled with a wide variety of creatures who don't much seem to notice their differences. they live in the beautiful valley of peace with an ancient temple towering overhead, up zillions of steps, which the pudgy po can barely climb. but climb them he does, dragging a noodle wagon, because all the people of the valley have gathered up there to witnethe choosing of the dragon warrior, who will engage the dreaded tai lung (ian mcshane) in kung-fu combat. five contenders have been selected, the "furious five": monkey (jackie chan), tigre(angelina jolie), mantis (seth rogen), viper (lucy liu) and crane (david cross). tigrelooks like she might be able to do some serious damage, but the others are lethan impressive. mantis in particular seems to weigh about an ounce, tops. all five have been trained (for nearly forever, i gather) by the wise shifu, who with dustin hoffman's voice is one of the more dimensional characters in a story that doesn't give the others a lot of depth. anyway, it's up to the temple master oogway (randall duk kim), an ancient turtle, to make the final selection, and he chooses -- yes, he chooses the hapleand pudgy po. the story then becomes essentially a series of action sequences, somewhat undermined by the fact that the combatants seem unable to be hurt, even if they fall from dizzying heights and crack stones open with their heads. there's an extended combat with tai lung on a disintegrating suspension bridge (haven't we seen that before?), hand-to-hand-to-tail combat with po and tai lung, and upstaging everything, an energetic competition over a single dumpling. "kung fu panda" is not one of the great recent animated films. the story is way too predictable, and truth to tell, po himself didn't overwhelm me with his charisma but it's elegantly drawn, the action sequences are packed with energy, and it's short enough that older viewers will be forgiving. for the kids, of course, all this stuff is much of a muchness, and here they go again.
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息,可以点下面链接进行举报!
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯