文言文方法翻译诗歌,诗歌能被翻译吗

文言文方法翻译诗歌,诗歌能被翻译吗

在欧洲，少数人认为诗歌是不能翻译的：（1）意大利作家（如埃科）所引用的熟语—译者即背叛者（traduttore, traditore. A translator is a traitor）（2）德莱顿《奥维德书信集》译序中引用的邓汉姆的评论—诗具有一种微妙的精神，当你把它从一种语言移入另一种语言的时候，那种精神就会完全消失。你如果不把一种新的精神加入译文，那来，译出来的东西除了一堆渣滓外就什么也没有了。（Sir John Denham (who advised more liberty than he took himself) gives his reason for his innovation, in his admirable preface before the translation of the second Aeneid. “poesie is of so subtle a spirit, that in pouring out of one Language into another, it will all evaporate; and if a new spirit be not added in the transfusion, there will be nothing but a Caput mortuum, ”） The poetical works of John Dryden, Volume 5 p9 （3）雪莱《为诗一辩》的批评—译诗是待劳无益的，把一个诗人的创作从一种语言译成另一种语言，犹如把一朵紫罗兰投入坩埚，企图由此探索它的色泽和香味的构造原理，其为不智一也。（Hence the vanity of translation; it were as wise to cast a violet into a crucible that you might discover the formal principle of its color and odor, as seek to transfuse from one language into another the creations of a poet. The plant must spring again from its seed, or it will bear no flower—and this is the burden of the curse of Babel.）（4）弗洛斯特所谓诗就是翻译中失去的东西。（You've often heard me say – perhaps too often – that poetry is what is lost in translation. It is also what is lost in interpretation.）Louis Untermeyer，Robert Frost: A Backward Look 据泰特勒Tytler《翻译原理》，郑振铎《译文学书的三个问题》（1921）极简略地介绍了前三种说法。戴望舒回应了邓汉姆的评论，《诗论零札》（1944）写道：“说‘诗不能翻译’是一个通常的错误，只有坏诗一经翻译才失去一切。因为实际它并没有‘诗’包涵在内，而只是字眼和声音的炫弄，只是渣滓。真正的诗在任何语言的翻译里都永远保持它的价值。而这价值，不但是地域，就是时间也不能损坏的。翻译可以说是诗的试金石，诗的滤罗。不用说，我是指并不歪曲原作的翻译。”
在欧洲，少数人认为诗......余下全文>>

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息