英语翻译（中翻英）

1914年,美国最高法院通过威克斯案在联邦案件中最早采用了非法证据排除规则,但很长一段时间内这一规则在各州并不适用.该规则在理论上争论也很大,大法官本杰明·卡多佐就曾认为该规则确立的后果是"只因警察的微小错误就让罪犯逍遥法外."所以直到1961年马普诉俄亥俄州(Mapp v Ohio)一案,美国联邦最高法院明确宣布,为加强刑事司法人权保障,排除规则亦适用于各州法院系统,非法证据排除规则才在全美各州确立并得以进一步的发展

In 1914, the U.S. Supreme Court case in the federal cases by Wicks earliest use of illegal evidence exclusion rules, but a very long period of time in the states this rule does not apply. The rule is also a great controversy in theory, the Lord Chancellor Benjamin Cardozo once considered the consequences of the establishment of the rule is "just because a tiny mistake the police let criminals go unpunished." So until 1961 the Max Planck v. Ohio (Mapp v Ohio) a case, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly declared , to strengthen the criminal justice, protection of human rights, exclusionary rule also applies to state court system, illegal evidence exclusion rules will state in the nation to the further development and of established .

In 1914, the U.S. Supreme Court case in the federal cases by Wicks earliest use of illegal evidence exclusion rules, but a very long period of time in the states this rule does not apply. The rule is also a great controversy in theory, the Lord Chancellor Benjamin Cardozo once considered the consequences of the establishment of the rule is "just because a tiny mistake the police let criminals go unpunished." So until 1961 the Max Planck v. Ohio (Mapp v Ohio) a case, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly declared , to strengthen the criminal justice, protection of human rights, exclusionary rule also applies to state court system, illegal evidence exclusion rules will state in the nation to the further development of established and

In 1914, the America supreme court case in the federal cases by wekesi use of illegal evidence exclusion rules, but a very long period of time in the states this rule does not apply. The rule is also a great controversy in theory, in the lord Chancellor Benjamin Cardozo once considered the consepuences of the establishment of the rule is "just because a tiny mistake the police let criminals go unpunished." So until 1961 the Max Planck v. Ohio (Mapp v Ohio) a case, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly declared , to strengthen the criminal justice, protection of human rights, exclusionary rule also applies to state court system, illegal evidence exclusion rules will state in the nation to the further development and of established. O(∩_∩)O~

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息