【2010年高考改革】书面表达(满分20分)北京大学2010年将试行由中学校长...
答案:2 悬赏:70 手机版
解决时间 2021-01-31 21:32
- 提问者网友：末路
- 2021-01-31 07:15
【2010年高考改革】书面表达(满分20分)北京大学2010年将试行由中学校长...
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：摆渡翁
- 2021-01-31 07:29
【答案】 One possible version:
Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010. the recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.
Some people approve of this move. They think this is a bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first – class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all – round development.
However quite a few people object to the move. Firstly it may lead to cheating. Secondly only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students which is unfair to so many school across the country. Thirdly there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.
As far as I’m concerned I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent cheating is impossible. Besides we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.
Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010. the recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.
Some people approve of this move. They think this is a bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first – class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all – round development.
However quite a few people object to the move. Firstly it may lead to cheating. Secondly only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students which is unfair to so many school across the country. Thirdly there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.
As far as I’m concerned I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent cheating is impossible. Besides we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.
全部回答
- 1楼网友：醉吻情书
- 2021-01-31 08:10
谢谢了
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯