高分加急英语帮忙解释下

What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

“People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events" (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge?

All knowledge claims should be open to rational criticism. On what grounds and to what extent would you agree with this assertion?

“What separates science from all other human activities is its belief in the provisional nature of all conclusions” (Michael Shermer, www.edge.com). Critically evaluate this way of distinguishing the sciences from other areas of knowledge?

To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

Examine the ways empirical evidence should be used to make progress in different areas of knowledge.

Discuss the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative data in supporting knowledge claims in the human sciences and at least one other area of knowledge.

How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true?

历史和科学的解说有什么相同点和不同点

人需要相信在混乱事件中的命令可以被忽视（约翰·格雷改编的异端,2004年）。你会用哪一种方法和哪一种程度来来说明这个主张在至少两个不同的知识领域是相关的。

所有的知识要求权都应该对理性的批判公开。你会用多大程度的理由来同意这个论断。

在所有结论中什么是它把科学和人类的其他活动分开的临时本质中的信念？严肃地评估一下这种区别科学和其它领域知识的方法。

在什么程度上是数学，艺术和道德伦理的真正不同之处?

检查一下经验证据需要被在不同知识领域被用来促进进步的方法

讨论一下量和质的信息在支持人类科学中知识产权的有力点和限制点，至少一个知识领域。

不同的认知方式是怎么帮助我们区别有些事情是确实是实事和有些事情被相信认为是实事的。

给我点时间

What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

在历史和科学的解释之间存在哪些异同？

“People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events" (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge?

“人们需要相信，秩序能够在事件的混乱中被瞥见”（选摘自约翰格雷2004年专栏）。你认为这种说法究竟以什么方式以及在多大程度上在至少两个领域的知识中适合（切题，有价值，有道理）？

All knowledge claims should be open to rational criticism. On what grounds and to what extent would you agree with this assertion?

所有的知识主张应对理性批判开放（接受理性批判）。你有什么理由以及在多大程度上同意这种说法？

“What separates science from all other human activities is its belief in the provisional nature of all conclusions” (Michael Shermer, www.edge.com). Critically evaluate this way of distinguishing the sciences from other areas of knowledge?

“把科学与所有其他人类活动分开的，是它的一种理念，即认为所有论断具有临时性的性质”（迈克尔舍默，www.edge.com）。批判地评价这种区别科学于其他领域知识的方法？

To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?

真理在数学、艺术和道德中存在着何种程度上的区别？

Examine the ways empirical evidence should be used to make progress in different areas of knowledge.

检查经验证据应被用来实现不同知识领域的进展的方式/方法。

Discuss the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative data in supporting knowledge claims in the human sciences and at least one other area of knowledge.

讨论定量和定性数据在支持人文科学和其他至少一个知识领域的知识主张时的长处和局限性。

How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true?

不同方式的先知（知识）如何帮助我们区分那些真实的事物和那些被相信为真实的事物？