一篇关于环保的英语短文
答案:2 悬赏:0 手机版
解决时间 2021-12-23 20:21
- 提问者网友：战魂
- 2021-12-23 05:06
一篇关于环保的英语短文
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：猎心人
- 2021-12-23 06:22
How Much Nature Is Enough?
By Andrew C.Revkin
Even some ardent conservationists acknowledge that the diversity of life on Earth cannot be fully sustained as human populations expand? use more resources? nudge the climate and move weedlike pests and predators from place to place.
Given that some losses are inevitable? the debate among many experts has shifted to an uncomfortable subject? what level of loss is acceptable. The discussion is taking place at both the local and global levels? How small can a fragment of an ecosystem be and still function in all its richness? and thus be considered preserved？ And as global biodiversity diminishes? is it a valid fallback strategy to bank organisms and genes in zoos? DNA banks or the like? or does this simply justify more habitat destruction？ Is nature on ice a sufficient substitute for the real thing？ Some conservation groups have strenuously avoided or even attacked such calculations and strategies. They say there is no safe diminution of habitat as long as human understanding of ecology is as sketchy as it is? a fallback strategy is unthinkable. Furthermore? banking nature in a deep freeze or database of gene sequences cannot capture context. For instance? even if a vanished bird was someday reconstituted from its genes? would it warble with the same fluency as its ancestors？ On the other side of the debate? those considering what the smallest viable habitats are or how to expand archives as an insurance policy say that re......余下全文>>
By Andrew C.Revkin
Even some ardent conservationists acknowledge that the diversity of life on Earth cannot be fully sustained as human populations expand? use more resources? nudge the climate and move weedlike pests and predators from place to place.
Given that some losses are inevitable? the debate among many experts has shifted to an uncomfortable subject? what level of loss is acceptable. The discussion is taking place at both the local and global levels? How small can a fragment of an ecosystem be and still function in all its richness? and thus be considered preserved？ And as global biodiversity diminishes? is it a valid fallback strategy to bank organisms and genes in zoos? DNA banks or the like? or does this simply justify more habitat destruction？ Is nature on ice a sufficient substitute for the real thing？ Some conservation groups have strenuously avoided or even attacked such calculations and strategies. They say there is no safe diminution of habitat as long as human understanding of ecology is as sketchy as it is? a fallback strategy is unthinkable. Furthermore? banking nature in a deep freeze or database of gene sequences cannot capture context. For instance? even if a vanished bird was someday reconstituted from its genes? would it warble with the same fluency as its ancestors？ On the other side of the debate? those considering what the smallest viable habitats are or how to expand archives as an insurance policy say that re......余下全文>>
全部回答
- 1楼网友：不甚了了
- 2021-12-23 07:09
这个解释是对的
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯