普通高中必修3 短文阅读 Good or bad
答案:2 悬赏:30 手机版
解决时间 2021-12-26 08:14
- 提问者网友：缘字诀
- 2021-12-25 08:26
普通高中必修3 短文阅读 Good or bad
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：举杯邀酒敬孤独
- 2021-12-25 09:08
Is gun play good or bad for children? For many years I emphasized its harmlessness. When concerned parents expressed doubt about letting their children have toy guns, because they didn’t want to encourage them in the slightest degree to become criminals, I would explain how little connection there was. In the course of growing up, children have a natural tendency to bring their aggressiveness more and more under control if their parents encourage this. One- to two-year-olds, when they are angry with another child, may bite the child’s arm without hesitation. But by 3 or 4 they have already learned that aggression is not right. However, they may pretend to shoot their mother or father, but smiling to assure them that the gun and the aggressive behaviour aren’t to be taken seriously.
In the 6- to 12-year-old period, children will play an earnest game of war, but it has lots of rules. There may be arguments, but real fights are relatively rare. At this age children don’t shoot at their mother or father, even in fun. It’s not that the parents have turned stricter; the children’s own conscience has. In adolescence aggressive feelings become much stronger, but well brought-up children can turn them into athletics and other competition or into kidding their friends.
In other words, I’d explain that playing at war is a natural step in the disciplining of the aggression of young children; that a cautious parent doesn’t really need to worry about producing a criminal.
But nowadays I’d give parents much more encouragement to guide their child away from violence. A number of incidents have convinced me of the importance of this.
One of the first things that made me change my mind, several years ago, was an observation that an experienced nursery school teacher told me about. Her children were hitting each other much more than previously, without reason. When she talked to them, they would protest, “But that’s what the Three Stooges do.” (This was a children’s TV program full of violence which immediately became very popular.)
What further shocked me into reconsidering my view was the assassination(暗杀）of the former President, and the fact that some school children cheered about this. (I didn’t so much blame the children as I blamed the kind of parents who will say about a President they dislike, “I’d shoot him if I got the chance!”）
These incidents made me think of other evidences that Americans often tolerate lawlessness and violence. We were hard on the Indians and the later waves of immigrants. At times we denied justice to groups with different religions or political views. And now a great percentage of our adult as well as our child population has been endlessly fascinated with dramas of Western violence and with cruel crime stories, in movies and on television. This doesn’t necessarily mean that we Americans on the average have more aggressiveness inside us than the people of other nations. I think rather that the aggressiveness we have is less controlled, from childhood on.
To me it seems very clear that in order to have a more stable and civilized national life we must bring up the next generation of Americans with a greater respect for law and for other people’s rights than in the past. There are many ways in which we could and should teach these attitudes. One simple opportunity we could seize in the first half of childhood is to show our disapproval of lawlessness and violence in television programs and in children’s gun play.
I also believe that the survival of the world now depends on a much greater awareness of the need to avoid war and to actively seek peaceful agreements. There are enough nuclear arms to completely destroy all civilization. This terrifying situation demands a much greater stability and self-control on the part of national leaders and citizens than they have ever shown in the past. We owe it to our children to prepare them deliberately for this awesome responsibility.
11. The underlined word “this” in Paragraph 1 refers to______.
A. controlling their aggressiveness B. playing with toy guns
C. aggressive behaviour D. the course of growing up
12. Based on the author’s view about the relationship between children’s aggressiveness and their age, which of the following is true?
A. A 2-year old boy knows that it is not correct to behave aggressively.
B. The older children become, the less aggressive they will be.
C. 6- to 12-year-olds enjoy war games but develop them into argument and serious fights.
D. Adolescents’ aggressiveness is often displayed in the form of competition.
13. What conclusion does the author intend to draw from the story told by the nursery school teacher?
A. Watching violence can lower a child’s standard of behaviour.
B. Violent TV programs should be banned in nursery schools.
C. Children are generally lawless or violent nowadays.
D. It is acceptable to let children have toy guns.
14. What does Paragraph 7 mainly talk about?
A. Examples showing that Americans are more aggressive than other nations.
B. Evidences proving that America has a long history of lawlessness and violence.
C. The idea that children are less able to put their aggressiveness under control.
D. More reasons why the author changed his view on the main issue of the article.
15. What is a must if people intend to enjoy stability and civilized national life?
A. To show disapproval of gun play in television programs.
B. To make people aware that there are already enough nuclear arms.
C. To elect national leaders with greater stability and self-control.
D. To bring up children who show more respect for the law and others’ rights.
11-15 ABADD
In the 6- to 12-year-old period, children will play an earnest game of war, but it has lots of rules. There may be arguments, but real fights are relatively rare. At this age children don’t shoot at their mother or father, even in fun. It’s not that the parents have turned stricter; the children’s own conscience has. In adolescence aggressive feelings become much stronger, but well brought-up children can turn them into athletics and other competition or into kidding their friends.
In other words, I’d explain that playing at war is a natural step in the disciplining of the aggression of young children; that a cautious parent doesn’t really need to worry about producing a criminal.
But nowadays I’d give parents much more encouragement to guide their child away from violence. A number of incidents have convinced me of the importance of this.
One of the first things that made me change my mind, several years ago, was an observation that an experienced nursery school teacher told me about. Her children were hitting each other much more than previously, without reason. When she talked to them, they would protest, “But that’s what the Three Stooges do.” (This was a children’s TV program full of violence which immediately became very popular.)
What further shocked me into reconsidering my view was the assassination(暗杀）of the former President, and the fact that some school children cheered about this. (I didn’t so much blame the children as I blamed the kind of parents who will say about a President they dislike, “I’d shoot him if I got the chance!”）
These incidents made me think of other evidences that Americans often tolerate lawlessness and violence. We were hard on the Indians and the later waves of immigrants. At times we denied justice to groups with different religions or political views. And now a great percentage of our adult as well as our child population has been endlessly fascinated with dramas of Western violence and with cruel crime stories, in movies and on television. This doesn’t necessarily mean that we Americans on the average have more aggressiveness inside us than the people of other nations. I think rather that the aggressiveness we have is less controlled, from childhood on.
To me it seems very clear that in order to have a more stable and civilized national life we must bring up the next generation of Americans with a greater respect for law and for other people’s rights than in the past. There are many ways in which we could and should teach these attitudes. One simple opportunity we could seize in the first half of childhood is to show our disapproval of lawlessness and violence in television programs and in children’s gun play.
I also believe that the survival of the world now depends on a much greater awareness of the need to avoid war and to actively seek peaceful agreements. There are enough nuclear arms to completely destroy all civilization. This terrifying situation demands a much greater stability and self-control on the part of national leaders and citizens than they have ever shown in the past. We owe it to our children to prepare them deliberately for this awesome responsibility.
11. The underlined word “this” in Paragraph 1 refers to______.
A. controlling their aggressiveness B. playing with toy guns
C. aggressive behaviour D. the course of growing up
12. Based on the author’s view about the relationship between children’s aggressiveness and their age, which of the following is true?
A. A 2-year old boy knows that it is not correct to behave aggressively.
B. The older children become, the less aggressive they will be.
C. 6- to 12-year-olds enjoy war games but develop them into argument and serious fights.
D. Adolescents’ aggressiveness is often displayed in the form of competition.
13. What conclusion does the author intend to draw from the story told by the nursery school teacher?
A. Watching violence can lower a child’s standard of behaviour.
B. Violent TV programs should be banned in nursery schools.
C. Children are generally lawless or violent nowadays.
D. It is acceptable to let children have toy guns.
14. What does Paragraph 7 mainly talk about?
A. Examples showing that Americans are more aggressive than other nations.
B. Evidences proving that America has a long history of lawlessness and violence.
C. The idea that children are less able to put their aggressiveness under control.
D. More reasons why the author changed his view on the main issue of the article.
15. What is a must if people intend to enjoy stability and civilized national life?
A. To show disapproval of gun play in television programs.
B. To make people aware that there are already enough nuclear arms.
C. To elect national leaders with greater stability and self-control.
D. To bring up children who show more respect for the law and others’ rights.
11-15 ABADD
全部回答
- 1楼网友：第四晚心情
- 2021-12-25 09:43
chatting online is good for us 网上聊天对我们有利
nowadays, chatting online is becoming more and more popular. some parents and teachers think that making e-pals is bad for us. but i think there are many benefits to making friends online. we should make friends online.
现在，网上聊天正变得越来越流行。一些家长和老师认为交网友对我们不好。但是我认为交网友有许多好处。我们应该在网上交朋友。
first, making friends online can bring us happiness. when we are talking with our e-pals, we can forget a lot of trouble and stay away from sadness. second, making friends online can make us open our eyes and know many things we don't know before. because many friends are from all parts of the country,and even foreign countries. third, making friends online can make us improve ourselves. when we get along with our friends, we want to show our best to our friends, so we had to try our best to improve ourselves.
首先，交网友能带给我们很多快乐。当我们和网友聊天的时候，我们可以忘记一些烦恼并且远离悲伤。第二，交网友能开阔我们的视野并且知道许多我们不知道的事情。因为许多网友来自我们国家的不同地方甚至世界的其他地方。第三，交网友能提高我们自己。当我们和我们的网友相处的时候，我们想把我们最好的一面显示给对方，所以我们不得不尽力去提高我们自己。
in a word, making friends online are good for us. through our e-pals, we can feel happy, learn more knowledge and improve ourselves. so i think that we middle school students should make friends onlines.
总而言之，网上聊天对我们有好处。通过网友，我们能感到快乐，学习更多的知道并且提高我们自己。所以我认为我们中学生应该在网上交朋友。
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯