帮忙翻译下 There are many different stories about the

帮忙翻译下

There are many different stories about the downturn in the proper use of English.Surely students should be able to distinguish between their/there/they're or the distinctive difference between complimentary and complementary. They unfairly bear the bulk of the criticism for these knowledge deficits because there is a sense that they should know better.

Students are not dumb, but they are being misled everywhere they look and listen. For example, signs in grocery stores point them to the stationary, even though the actual stationery items-pads, albums and notebooks - are not nailed down, Friends and loved ones often proclaim they've just ate when, in fact, they've just eaten. Therefore,it doesn't make any sense to criticize our students.

Blame for the scandal of this language deficit should be thrust upon our schools,which should be setting high standards of English language proficiency. Instead, they only teach a little grammar and even less advanced vocabulary. Moreover, the younger teachers themselves evidently have little knowledge of these vital structures of language because they also went without exposure to them. Schools fail to adequately teach the essential framework of language, accurate grammar and proper vocabulary, while they should take the responsibility of pushing the young onto the path of competent communication.

关于英语的正确使用，有许多不同的故事。当然，学生们应该能够区分他们自己或他们之间的区别或者互补和互补之间的区别。他们不公平地承受了对这些知识赤字的大部分批评，因为他们感到他们应该知道得更多。学生们并不愚蠢，但他们看和听的地方都被误导了。例如，杂货店的标牌指向文具店，尽管文具——信纸、相册和笔记本——并没有被钉牢，朋友和爱人经常宣称他们刚吃过东西，而事实上，他们刚吃过。因此，批评我们的学生是没有任何意义的。这种语言缺陷的丑闻应该归咎于我们的学校，学校应该设置高标准的英语语言能力。相反，他们只教一点语法，更不用说高级词汇了。此外，年轻教师自己显然对语言的这些重要结构知之甚少，因为他们也没有接触过这些结构。学校未能充分教授语言的基本框架、准确的语法和恰当的词汇，而应该负起将年轻人推上有效沟通道路的责任。

搜一下：帮忙翻译下 There are many different stories about the

懂是懂，但是这么长你确定5分！？？？

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息