谁知道英美法合同中格式之争的经典案例Dorton v. Collins & Aikman Corp.到底讲了些什么啊！！求中文解释

谁知道英美法合同中格式之争的经典案例Dorton v. Collins & Aikman Corp.到底讲了些什么啊！！求中文解释

合同法:
<> 概要:
"Dorton (plaintiff), who did business as Carpet Mart, purchased carpets
from Collins & Aikman Corp. (Collins) (defendant) for three years
before bringing an action against Collins for fraud and
misrepresentation regarding the quality of the carpets. Collins moved to
enforce an arbitration clause that was printed in small print on the
reverse side of all of its sales acknowledgment forms. These forms were
sent to Dorton in response to Dorton’s telephone orders and were
received by Dorton in almost all cases prior to Dorton’s receipt of the
carpet shipment. Dorton accepted each of the carpet shipments without
objecting to the terms on the sales acknowledgment forms. Relying on
U.C.C. § 2-207(3), the district court found that no binding arbitration
agreement was formed between the parties and denied Collins’ request for
a stay. Collins appealed the denial of a stay."

看了下最后一句，判决结果是发回区法院重审。

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息