英语The French Disease 是什么意思?
答案:3 悬赏:0 手机版
解决时间 2021-03-26 13:18
- 提问者网友：十年饮冰
- 2021-03-25 23:36
英语The French Disease 是什么意思?
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：北方的南先生
- 2021-03-25 23:49
16世纪法国文艺复兴前的封建文化弊病。
全部回答
- 1楼网友：空山清雨
- 2021-03-26 03:02
法国疾病
- 2楼网友：野慌
- 2021-03-26 01:25
就是syphilis，梅毒。
具体原因，我只有英文的，您参看一下吧。
``The French Disease'' is what the Italians of the 16th century called syphilis; the French, naturally, called it the Italian Disease, or the Disease of Naples. For a couple of years, I've been using the phrase as a mocking label for structuralism (with some caveats) and post-structuralism and post-modernism (with no caveats). I know perfectly well that (1) the French produce plenty of excellent intellectual works which in no way deserve to be associated with this nonsense, which is unfortunate for the label (but fortunate for the French, and indeed the rest of us) and (2) said nonsense is not exclusively, and by this point maybe not even mostly, French (which only makes the joke better, once you know the relevant history). ``Studies in the French Disease'' is going to be a highly irregular series of reviews of books which are themselves structuralist, post-structrualist, etc., or about structrualism and its kin. I'd like to protest lofty motives (like an inability to stomach humbug, or a wish to help maintain the standards of intellectual discourse) and deep qualifications (like actually knowing something about logic), but mere desires to sow mischief, to show off, and to write harsh reviews are probably closer to the mark. Since many of the books written as prophylactics against the French Disease are fully as bad as its instances, the last-named can be satisfied in a reasonably even-handed manner.
具体原因，我只有英文的，您参看一下吧。
``The French Disease'' is what the Italians of the 16th century called syphilis; the French, naturally, called it the Italian Disease, or the Disease of Naples. For a couple of years, I've been using the phrase as a mocking label for structuralism (with some caveats) and post-structuralism and post-modernism (with no caveats). I know perfectly well that (1) the French produce plenty of excellent intellectual works which in no way deserve to be associated with this nonsense, which is unfortunate for the label (but fortunate for the French, and indeed the rest of us) and (2) said nonsense is not exclusively, and by this point maybe not even mostly, French (which only makes the joke better, once you know the relevant history). ``Studies in the French Disease'' is going to be a highly irregular series of reviews of books which are themselves structuralist, post-structrualist, etc., or about structrualism and its kin. I'd like to protest lofty motives (like an inability to stomach humbug, or a wish to help maintain the standards of intellectual discourse) and deep qualifications (like actually knowing something about logic), but mere desires to sow mischief, to show off, and to write harsh reviews are probably closer to the mark. Since many of the books written as prophylactics against the French Disease are fully as bad as its instances, the last-named can be satisfied in a reasonably even-handed manner.
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯