《饥饿游戏》英文影评120词左右

《饥饿游戏》英文影评120词左右

the hunger games shows us a story about a young lady's unfortunate experience. compared with the original book, this movie just change some details, but it doesn't destroy the things the author wanted to express. and from this movie, we can learn many things.
first，as the leading lady jennifer lawrence said, katniss everdeen just like joan of arc who was famous for leading people to revolution in history. this movie isn't just a love story, of course. it shows us that people living under cruel control's desire of freedom, as a result, somebody turns up and protests in his own way. it's a warn not only for those who take control of the social order, but the relationship in our daily life.
second, katniss was really nice. she volunteered to save her sister, what's more, she made her family alive by hunting in the wood illegally after her father's death. she share her food with rue,and when rue died, she used flowers and showed her respect. she wanted to make peeta and herself alive, and she was smart enough to catch up with the idea that they could use the night locks because capitol needs one winner, and she made it anyway, but obviously got trouble.
last but not least, this movie shows us that katniss wasn't a powerful one, she led people to revolution accidentally, and her fate changed and she must be the mocking jay, the symbol of freedom. it's not her own choice, but there was force, and she actually just a role arranged by the people that lead the world and people who wanted freedom. it's certain that many people would die for freedom and it would be tragic. and the fact that we should know is that when one can't decide his own life, he 'd better do something to save the world.

........ssssssssssss

影评1： Simply, many over the age of 18 read these books and loved them, and it wasn't because there was a girl, a boy, and another boy in a love story. It was about an awful political system where children faced to the death for their survival with awful paragraphs of cruel brutality. This is part of what made the book unique. The movie, was an attempt to draw a crowd like Twilight for money, and completely blurred out children killing each other to survive so that it could be made PG13. Ridiculous. Jennifer Lawerence is an AWESOME actress though, and she did a great job. Throughout the movie I was never convinced that she lived in district 12 nearly starving... or that Peeta was dying in the hunger games.. it was all very pretty and not anything like I imagined they would do with it. Oh well, maybe they'll remake a rated R version some day that adequately portrays the books theme. 影评2： I went to this movie opening night to see what all the hype was about, having not read the books prior I thought this movie was okay. first impression was not good, wished this movie was made to target a more adult/mature audience. After I watched the movie I went out and bought the book. upon reading the book i noticed a lot of things i wish were in the movie. mainly explaining why life was like that, during the movie i found myself asking a lot of questions as to why, why did the hunger games even exist? why were there 12 districts? nothing was explained. also the main point of the book was non existent in the movie. it showed hardly any hardship and the parts that tried to portray that were disappointing and cheesy at best. the actual competition was lacking as well. It is supposed to be brutal? defiantly not, i did not find it convincing. i hope they make the next movies better, explain more things since not everyone read the books before going and i hope they change their target audience to do these books proper justice. 影评3： It's a shame how one aspect can spoil the entire experience but that's what happened for me. Other reviewers have commented on the use of hand-held shaky-cam, fast-cut camera-work - none of them positively that I can find. From the Trivia section on IMDb we read this one sentence: ---- The director has stated that his decision to go with shaky cam work, "had a lot to do with the urgency of what's going on and to reflect protagonist Katniss Everdeen's point of view." ---- There was nothing "urgent" about the first 2/3rds of the film. I'm glad I don't go around throwing my head from side-to-side in normal life, stressed or not. When are film-makers going to realise they are the only ones that truly like this type of camera-work? They sit there editing the film on their desktop monitors in an office but faithful movie-goers have to watch their "creativity" on 50ft+ screens, where every sudden jerk sideways is at best distracting, at worst nauseating. It doesn't convey urgency, it conveys amateurism. Enough already. Hitchcock asked the composer Friedhofer, "where would the orchestra be?" when the latter wanted a string piece for a scene in "Lifeboat" The composer replied "The same place as the cameraman." We expect movies to have a soundtrack, and if the music is working properly, then we don't really notice it because it joins in with the visuals and enhances the scene. We are viewers of make-believe, sometimes realistic, often fantastical, and immersion into the world of the story is key to a satisfying movie-going experience. A camera being wiggled about on purpose draws attention to itself, and it shouldn't. This constant reminder of the presence of a, seemingly badly trained cameraman, is a real turn-off. Please stop it. As far as the other aspects of the film were concerned, I found the narrative somewhat plodding, and the pre-games section of the film could have done with being 20-30mins shorter. I knew nothing about the books beforehand, so I'm of the opinion that this is perhaps one for the S.Collins enthusiast rather than the general movie-goer. Though if the other reviews are anything to go by, plenty of Collins' readers are not very pleased either!

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息