法院仲裁是什么意思,学商务英语的同学们， 能不能告诉我什么是仲裁？ 仲裁与诉讼的区别是什么？？（最好附上英文，因为要考
答案:1 悬赏:30 手机版
解决时间 2021-08-23 11:30
- 提问者网友：温旧梦泪无声
- 2021-08-23 01:11
法院仲裁是什么意思,学商务英语的同学们， 能不能告诉我什么是仲裁？ 仲裁与诉讼的区别是什么？？（最好附上英文，因为要考
最佳答案
- 五星知识达人网友：春色三分
- 2021-08-23 02:15
What Are the Differences Between Arbitration and Litigation?
Arbitration and litigation are two types of legal dispute resolution. Litigation refers to the traditional court-based method of solving civil cases, while arbitration involves a more informal process that allows greater control by the involved parties. Arbitration and litigation are both legally binding forms of resolution, but each has distinct characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages.
When a civil dispute cannot be solved through conflict resolution matters outside of the legal system, deciding between arbitration and litigation becomes an important choice. Litigation typically must be used for the management of any criminal charges, but arbitration is usually a viable option for civil trials. Litigation may be brought by either party at any time, but choosing arbitration must be a joint decision by both involved parties. Arbitration may also be the result of a valid contract that requires the process as the only permissible means of solving legal disputes.
In litigation, attorneys and the judge nearly always run the show. Primary parties may be take part in the formation of the case, and may be called on to provide evidence and give testimony, but generally need to allow attorneys to handle the legal technicalities of the issue. Judges are chosen by the court, and neither clients nor attorneys have much say in which judge handles a case.
Arbitration, on the other hand, allows for greater involvement by......余下全文>>
Arbitration and litigation are two types of legal dispute resolution. Litigation refers to the traditional court-based method of solving civil cases, while arbitration involves a more informal process that allows greater control by the involved parties. Arbitration and litigation are both legally binding forms of resolution, but each has distinct characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages.
When a civil dispute cannot be solved through conflict resolution matters outside of the legal system, deciding between arbitration and litigation becomes an important choice. Litigation typically must be used for the management of any criminal charges, but arbitration is usually a viable option for civil trials. Litigation may be brought by either party at any time, but choosing arbitration must be a joint decision by both involved parties. Arbitration may also be the result of a valid contract that requires the process as the only permissible means of solving legal disputes.
In litigation, attorneys and the judge nearly always run the show. Primary parties may be take part in the formation of the case, and may be called on to provide evidence and give testimony, but generally need to allow attorneys to handle the legal technicalities of the issue. Judges are chosen by the court, and neither clients nor attorneys have much say in which judge handles a case.
Arbitration, on the other hand, allows for greater involvement by......余下全文>>
我要举报
如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！
点此我要举报以上问答信息
大家都在看
推荐资讯